The text explains the use of profanity as an expression of solidarity,
friendliness, expression and as a means to address (Daly, Holmes, Newton, &
Stubbe, 2004). This is of course meant to be used within come context. The
communication methods used between close friends wouldn’t be extended onto a
complete stranger, or any person not wishing it.
The text talks about the politeness theory and explains FTA (Face
Threatening Act). FTAs, occur regularly in everyday interaction, and are
expressed through positive (e.g., "please", need for approval) or
negative (e.g., "I know this is a terrible imposition", need for
privacy and distance from others, and to have their autonomy and independence
respected) face needs.
Example:
I was walking out of the Wollongong mall, when I and some scraggy
middle-aged man did the dance of the hallway. It was neither of our faults and
when passing by I promptly apologised and smiled, and he called me a stupid
B**(not nice word)**. I said nothing, and just stared at this man, who walked
with a limp and a slouch, and walked away. I then made a life plan that in the
future I’d like to live somewhere that doesn’t have a centrelink or people. The
man attempt in a FTA, and I made use of a negative politeness strategy
Daly, N., Holmes, J., Newton, J., & Stubbe, M (2004). Expletives as
solidarity signals in FTAs on the factory floor. Journal of Pragmatics 36, 945–964
Hi :) I hope this comment is very constructive
ReplyDeleteit helped alot, thanks
Delete